Sapindaceae sp. (Noah Creek BG 6026)
Explore the data for this taxon in the portal
Family Sapindaceae
Taxonomy: Sapindaceae sp. (Noah Creek BG 6026)
Synonyms: none listed in the APC 2026-07-30
Distribution (APC):
Profiles: APC, Flora of Australia, ALA, iNaturalist, ATRP
Traits
Top source datasets: Cooper_2013 (13), Gross_2005 (4), Sjostrom_2006 (4). See below for a full list of sources.
Summary: AusTraits contains 11 traits from 21 records in 3 datasets.
Traits by category (click to expand). For categorical traits, the values are listed. For numerical traits, the mean and range are shown.
flower morphology
- sex_type (categorical): monoecious (2) [sources: Gross_2005; Sjostrom_2006]
fruit morphology
- fruit_length (numerical): 30 mm (25-35 mm) [sources: Cooper_2013]
- fruit_width (numerical): 30 mm (25-35 mm) [sources: Cooper_2013]
- fruit_type (categorical): capsule (3) [sources: Cooper_2013; Gross_2005; Sjostrom_2006]
- fruit_fleshiness (categorical): dry (3) [sources: Cooper_2013; Gross_2005; Sjostrom_2006]
- fruit_dehiscence (categorical): dehiscent (3) [sources: Cooper_2013; Gross_2005; Sjostrom_2006]
life history
- plant_growth_form (categorical): tree (1) [sources: Cooper_2013]
- flowering_time (categorical): nnynnnnnnnnn (1) [sources: Cooper_2013]
seed morphology
- seed_length (numerical): 28.5 mm (27-30 mm) [sources: Cooper_2013]
whole plant morphology
- plant_height (numerical): 8 m (8-8 m) [sources: Cooper_2013]
Sources
| dataset_id | n_traits | n_records | reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cooper_2013 | 10 | 13 | W. Cooper and W. T. Cooper. Australian rainforest fruits. CSIRO Publishing, 2013, p. 272. |
| Gross_2005 | 4 | 4 | C. L. Gross. “A comparison of the sexual systems in the trees from the Australian tropics with other tropical biomes-more monoecy but why?”. American Journal of Botany 92.6 (2005), pp. 907-919. doi: 10.3732/ajb.92.6.907. |
| Sjostrom_2006 | 4 | 4 | A. Sjöström and C. L. Gross. “Life-history characters and phylogeny are correlated with extinction risk in the Australian angiosperms”. Journal of Biogeography 33.2 (2006), pp. 271-290. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2005.01393.x. |