Allophylus cobbe
Explore the data for this taxon in the portal
Family Sapindaceae
Taxonomy: Allophylus cobbe (L.) Blume
Synonyms: 7 (APC 2026-07-30)
- Allophyllus cobbe Blume (orthographic variant)
- Allophyllus crenatus Radlk. (taxonomic synonym)
- Allophyllus ternatus Radlk. (taxonomic synonym)
- Allophylus crenatus Radlk. (taxonomic synonym)
- Allophylus ternatus (G.Forst.) Radlk. (taxonomic synonym)
- Ornitrophe serrata Roxb. (taxonomic synonym)
- Rhus cobbe L. (nomenclatural synonym)
Misapplied names: 1 (APC 2026-07-30)
- Schmidelia serrata (Roxb.) DC. (misapplied)
Distribution (APC): CoI, ChI, NT, Qld
Profiles: APC, Flora of Australia, ALA, iNaturalist, NT eFlora, ATRP
Traits
Top source datasets: ABRS_1981 (1), ABRS_2022 (5), ABRS_2023 (19), ATRP_2020 (1), Brock_1993 (10), Chen_2017 (6), Cooper_2013 (13), Crowley_2007 (2), Gross_2005 (4), Kew_2019_1 (3), Kew_2019_3 (3), Kooyman_2011 (11), Nano_2011 (4), RussellSmith_2012 (4), Sjostrom_2006 (4), Wenk_2022 (2), Wenk_2023 (1), Wright_2000 (1), eFLOWER_Dun_2022 (18). See below for a full list of sources.
Summary: AusTraits contains 58 traits from 112 records in 19 datasets.
Traits by category (click to expand). For categorical traits, the values are listed. For numerical traits, the mean and range are shown.
fire response
- resprouting_capacity (categorical): resprouts (3) [sources: Crowley_2007; Nano_2011; RussellSmith_2012]
flower morphology
- flower_colour (categorical): white_cream (1) [sources: eFLOWER_Dun_2022]
- sex_type (categorical): monoecious (3) [sources: ABRS_2022; Gross_2005; Sjostrom_2006]
fruit morphology
- fruit_length (numerical): 6.17 mm (5-10 mm) [sources: Chen_2017; ABRS_2023; Cooper_2013]
- fruit_width (numerical): 5.17 mm (4-9 mm) [sources: Chen_2017; ABRS_2023; Cooper_2013]
- fruit_height (numerical): 4.5 mm (4-5 mm) [sources: ABRS_2023]
- fruit_type (categorical): berry (1); drupe (3) [sources: Chen_2017; Cooper_2013; Gross_2005; Sjostrom_2006]
- fruit_fleshiness (categorical): fleshy (4) [sources: Chen_2017; Cooper_2013; Gross_2005; Sjostrom_2006]
- fruit_dehiscence (categorical): indehiscent (5) [sources: ABRS_2023; Chen_2017; Cooper_2013; Gross_2005; Sjostrom_2006]
- fruit_colour (categorical): red (1) [sources: ABRS_2023]
leaf morphology
- leaf_length (numerical): 92.5 mm (15-190 mm) [sources: ABRS_2023; Brock_1993; Kooyman_2011]
- leaf_width (numerical): 35 mm (10-75 mm) [sources: ABRS_2023; Brock_1993; Kooyman_2011]
- petiole_length (numerical): 5 cm (2.5-7.5 cm) [sources: ABRS_2023]
- leaf_shape (categorical): elliptical (1); obovate (1); ovate (2); terete (1) [sources: ABRS_2023; Brock_1993]
- leaf_base_shape (categorical): cuneate (1); rounded (1); truncate (1) [sources: ABRS_2023]
- leaf_lobation (categorical): unlobed (1) [sources: Kooyman_2011]
- leaf_compoundness (categorical): compound (3) [sources: ABRS_2023; Brock_1993; Kooyman_2011]
- plant_photosynthetic_organ (categorical): leaf (1) [sources: ABRS_2023]
life history
- plant_growth_form (categorical): climber_woody (2); shrub (3); tree (4) [sources: ABRS_2022; ATRP_2020; Brock_1993; Cooper_2013; Kooyman_2011; Wenk_2022]
- life_history (categorical): perennial (3) [sources: ABRS_2022; Brock_1993; Wenk_2023]
- woodiness_detailed (categorical): semi_woody (1); woody (2) [sources: ABRS_2022; Wenk_2022]
- stem_growth_habit (categorical): climbing (1) [sources: ABRS_2022]
- leaf_phenology (categorical): evergreen (2) [sources: ABRS_1981; Kooyman_2011]
- flowering_time (categorical): yynnnnnnnnyy (1); yyynnnnnyyyy (1) [sources: Brock_1993; Cooper_2013]
- seedbank_location (categorical): none (1) [sources: Nano_2011]
- serotiny (categorical): not_serotinous (1) [sources: Nano_2011]
- seedbank_longevity_class (categorical): transient (1) [sources: RussellSmith_2012]
- bud_bank_location (categorical): basal_stem_buds (2) [sources: Crowley_2007; Nano_2011]
seed morphology
- seed_dry_mass (numerical): 52.24 mg (30.1-74.8 mg) [sources: Kew_2019_1]
- seed_length (numerical): 6 mm (4-8 mm) [sources: Cooper_2013; Kooyman_2011]
- seed_width (numerical): 4.5 mm (3-6 mm) [sources: Kooyman_2011]
- seed_shape (categorical): ovoid (1) [sources: ABRS_2023]
whole plant morphology
- plant_height (numerical): 6 m (6-6 m) [sources: Brock_1993; Cooper_2013]
Sources
| dataset_id | n_traits | n_records | reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ABRS_2023 | 13 | 19 | Australian Biological Resources Study. Flora of Australia, Australian Biological Resources Study, Canberra.. accessed on 14 September, 2022.. 2023. url: http://www.ausflora.org.au. |
| eFLOWER_Dun_2022 | 18 | 18 | L. Dun and H. Sauquet. “Unpublished: Floral traits for GAP taxa, University of New South Wales, Australia”. 2022. |
| Cooper_2013 | 10 | 13 | W. Cooper and W. T. Cooper. Australian rainforest fruits. CSIRO Publishing, 2013, p. 272. |
| Kooyman_2011 | 8 | 11 | R. Kooyman, M. Rossetto, W. Cornwell, and M. Westoby. “Phylogenetic tests of community assembly across regional to continental scales in tropical and subtropical rain forests”. Global Ecology and Biogeography 20 (2011), pp. 707-716. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00641.x. |
| Brock_1993 | 8 | 10 | J. Brock and A. Dunlop. Native plants of northern Australia. Reed New Holland, 1993. ISBN: 9781877069246. |
| Chen_2017 | 6 | 6 | Chen, S.-C., Cornwell, W., Z. H.-X., Moles, and A. T. “Plants show more flesh in the tropics: Variation in fruit type along latitudinal and climatic gradients.”. Ecography 40 (2017), pp. 531-538. doi: abs/10.1111/ecog.02010. |
| ABRS_2022 | 5 | 5 | Australian Biological Resources Study. Flora of Australia, Australian Biological Resources Study, Canberra.. accessed on 14 September, 2022.. 2022. url: http://www.ausflora.org.au. |
| Gross_2005 | 4 | 4 | C. L. Gross. “A comparison of the sexual systems in the trees from the Australian tropics with other tropical biomes-more monoecy but why?”. American Journal of Botany 92.6 (2005), pp. 907-919. doi: 10.3732/ajb.92.6.907. |
| Nano_2011 | 4 | 4 | C. E. M. Nano and P. J. Clarke. “How do drought and fire influence the patterns of resprouting in Australian deserts?”. Plant Ecology 212 (2011), pp. 2095-2110. doi: 10.1007/s11258-011-9988-x. |
| RussellSmith_2012 | 4 | 4 | J. Russell-Smith, M. R. Gardener, C. Brock, K. Brennan, C. P. Yates, and B. Grace. “Fire persistence traits can be used to predict vegetation response to changing fire regimes at expansive landscape scales - an Australian example”. Journal of Biogeography 39 (2012), pp. 1657-1668. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2012.02714.x. |
| Sjostrom_2006 | 4 | 4 | A. Sjöström and C. L. Gross. “Life-history characters and phylogeny are correlated with extinction risk in the Australian angiosperms”. Journal of Biogeography 33.2 (2006), pp. 271-290. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2005.01393.x. |
| Kew_2019_1 | 1 | 3 | Royal Botanic Gardens Kew. Seed Information Database (SID) and Seed Bank Database. 2019. url: http://data.kew.org/sid/. |
| Kew_2019_3 | 3 | 3 | Royal Botanic Gardens Kew. Salt and water tolerance data from the Seed Information Database (SID) and Seed Bank Database. 2019. url: http://data.kew.org/sid/. |
| Crowley_2007 | 2 | 2 | G. Crowley, M. Gardener, and M. Marrinan. Tropical savannas fire response database. 2007. url: [www.landmanager.org.au](www.landmanager.org.au). |
| Wenk_2022 | 2 | 2 | E. Wenk. “Unpublished data: Australian plant growth forms dataset”. 2022. |
| ABRS_1981 | 1 | 1 | B. A. Barlow, H. T. Clifford, A. S. George, and A. K. A. McCusker. Flora of Australia. 1981. url: http://www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity/abrs/online-resources/flora/main/. |
| ATRP_2020 | 1 | 1 | F. A. Zich, B. P. Hyland, T. Whiffin, and R. A. Kerrigan. Australian Tropical Rainforest Plants, Edition 8. 2020. url: https://apps.lucidcentral.org/rainforest/text/intro/index.html. |
| Wenk_2023 | 1 | 1 | E. Wenk. “Unpublished data: Australian plant life history dataset, University of New South Wales, Sydney”. 2023. |
| Wright_2000 | 1 | 1 | I. J. Wright, H. T. Clifford, R. Kidson, M. L. Reed, B. L. Rice, and M. Westoby. “A survey of seed and seedling characters in 1744 Australian dicotyledon species: Cross-species trait correlations and correlated trait-shifts within evolutionary lineages”. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 69 (2000), pp. 521-547. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2000.tb01222.x. |