Doryphora aromatica
Explore the data for this taxon in the portal
Family Atherospermataceae
Taxonomy: Doryphora aromatica (F.M.Bailey) L.S.Sm.
Synonyms: 1 (APC 2026-07-30)
- Daphnandra aromatica F.M.Bailey (nomenclatural synonym)
Distribution (APC): Qld
Profiles: APC, Flora of Australia, ALA, iNaturalist, ATRP
Traits
Top source datasets: ABRS_1981 (2), ABRS_2022 (4), ABRS_2023 (23), Bloomfield_2018 (124), Cheesman_2020 (23), Chen_2017 (5), Cooper_2013 (9), Gross_2005 (4), Grubb_2008 (3), Ilic_2000 (2), Kanowski_2000 (23), Kew_2019_1 (1), Kooyman_2011 (10), Rosell_2014 (8), Rumman_2018 (4), Sams_2017 (8), Sjostrom_2006 (4), Tng_2013 (6), Togashi_2015 (3), Wells_2012 (136), Wenk_2022 (2), Wenk_2023 (1), Wills_2018 (45), Wright_2000 (1), Zieminska_2015 (36). See below for a full list of sources.
Summary: AusTraits contains 111 traits from 487 records in 25 datasets.
Traits by category (click to expand). For categorical traits, the values are listed. For numerical traits, the mean and range are shown.
flower morphology
- sex_type (categorical): hermaphrodite (2); monoecious (1) [sources: ABRS_2022; Gross_2005; Sjostrom_2006]
fruit morphology
- fruit_length (numerical): 11.38 mm (3-23 mm) [sources: ABRS_2023; Cooper_2013]
- fruit_width (numerical): 2.5 mm (2-3 mm) [sources: ABRS_2023]
- fruit_height (numerical): 2.5 mm (2-3 mm) [sources: ABRS_2023]
- fruit_type (categorical): achene (6) [sources: ABRS_2023; Chen_2017; Cooper_2013; Gross_2005; Sams_2017; Sjostrom_2006]
- fruit_fleshiness (categorical): dry (6) [sources: Chen_2017; Cooper_2013; Gross_2005; Sams_2017; Sjostrom_2006; Wells_2012]
- fruit_dehiscence (categorical): dehiscent (1); indehiscent (6) [sources: ABRS_2023; Chen_2017; Cooper_2013; Gross_2005; Sams_2017; Sjostrom_2006; Wells_2012]
leaf morphology
- leaf_area (numerical): 2978.82 mm2 (1273.98-4549 mm2) [sources: Cheesman_2020; Kanowski_2000; Tng_2013; Wells_2012]
- leaf_length (numerical): 92.5 mm (50-135 mm) [sources: ABRS_2023]
- leaf_width (numerical): 40.75 mm (20-50 mm) [sources: ABRS_2023; Kooyman_2011]
- leaf_dry_mass (numerical): 205.06 mg (55.64-283.43 mg) [sources: Wells_2012]
- petiole_length (numerical): 0.65 cm (0.5-0.8 cm) [sources: ABRS_2023]
- leaf_mass_per_area (numerical): 76.15 g/m2 (43.68-110.77 g/m2) [sources: Bloomfield_2018; Cheesman_2020; Grubb_2008; Kanowski_2000; Sams_2017; Tng_2013; Wells_2012; Wills_2018; Zieminska_2015]
- leaf_dry_matter_content (numerical): 0.29 g/g (0.22-0.39 g/g) [sources: Bloomfield_2018; Wells_2012]
- leaf_water_content_per_dry_mass (numerical): 2.5 g/g (2.5-2.5 g/g) [sources: Grubb_2008]
- leaf_type (categorical): broadleaf (1) [sources: Rumman_2018]
- leaf_shape (categorical): elliptical (1); obovate (1) [sources: ABRS_2023]
- leaf_base_shape (categorical): attenuate (1); cuneate (1) [sources: ABRS_2023]
- leaf_margin (categorical): entire (1); toothed_serrate (1) [sources: ABRS_2023]
- leaf_lobation (categorical): unlobed (1) [sources: Kooyman_2011]
- leaf_compoundness (categorical): simple (2) [sources: ABRS_2023; Kooyman_2011]
- leaf_phyllotaxis (categorical): opposite (1) [sources: ABRS_2023]
- leaf_arrangement (categorical): decussate (1) [sources: ABRS_2023]
- plant_photosynthetic_organ (categorical): leaf (1) [sources: ABRS_2023]
life history
- plant_growth_form (categorical): tree (7) [sources: ABRS_2022; Cheesman_2020; Cooper_2013; Kooyman_2011; Rumman_2018; Wells_2012; Wenk_2022]
- life_history (categorical): perennial (2) [sources: ABRS_2022; Wenk_2023]
- woodiness_detailed (categorical): woody (2) [sources: ABRS_2022; Wenk_2022]
- leaf_phenology (categorical): evergreen (2) [sources: ABRS_1981; Kooyman_2011]
- pollination_syndrome (categorical): beetle (1) [sources: Wells_2012]
- dispersers (categorical): wind (2) [sources: Sams_2017; Wells_2012]
- flowering_time (categorical): nyyyyynnnnnn (3) [sources: ABRS_1981; Chen_2017; Cooper_2013]
nutrient and stable isotope
- leaf_N_per_dry_mass (numerical): 21.71 mg/g (10.03-27.8 mg/g) [sources: Bloomfield_2018; Cheesman_2020; Grubb_2008; Kanowski_2000; Wills_2018]
- leaf_P_per_dry_mass (numerical): 1.53 mg/g (0.56-2.04 mg/g) [sources: Bloomfield_2018; Kanowski_2000; Wills_2018]
- leaf_delta13C (numerical): -32.5 {delta}[ppth] (-34.55--30.04 {delta}[ppth]) [sources: Cheesman_2020; Rumman_2018; Tng_2013]
physiology
- leaf_photosynthetic_rate_per_area_maximum (numerical): 6.14 umol{CO2}/m2/s (2.46-11.9 umol{CO2}/m2/s) [sources: Bloomfield_2018]
- leaf_photosynthetic_rate_per_dry_mass_maximum (numerical): 0.06 umol{CO2}/g/s (0.02-0.13 umol{CO2}/g/s) [sources: Bloomfield_2018]
- leaf_stomatal_conductance_per_area_at_Amax (numerical): 20.5 mmol{H2O}/m2/s (8.8-52.8 mmol{H2O}/m2/s) [sources: Bloomfield_2018]
seed morphology
- seed_dry_mass (numerical): 10 mg (10-10 mg) [sources: Kew_2019_1]
- seed_length (numerical): 3 mm (3-3 mm) [sources: Kooyman_2011]
- seed_width (numerical): 2 mm (2-2 mm) [sources: Kooyman_2011]
stem morphology
- wood_density (numerical): 0.48 mg/mm3 (0.39-0.58 mg/mm3) [sources: Ilic_2000; Kooyman_2011; Rosell_2014; Tng_2013; Wells_2012; Zieminska_2015]
- huber_value (numerical): 0 mm2{sapwood}/mm2{leaf} (0-0 mm2{sapwood}/mm2{leaf}) [sources: Togashi_2015; Zieminska_2015]
- stem_vessel_density (numerical): 335.88 {count}/mm2 (254.57-383.56 {count}/mm2) [sources: Zieminska_2015]
- stem_vessel_diameter (numerical): 28.18 um (26.38-30.43 um) [sources: Zieminska_2015]
- stem_vessel_lumen_fraction (numerical): 0.21 mm2/mm2 (0.19-0.23 mm2/mm2) [sources: Zieminska_2015]
whole plant morphology
- plant_height (numerical): 33 m (12-40 m) [sources: ABRS_2023; Cooper_2013]
Sources
| dataset_id | n_traits | n_records | reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wells_2012 | 23 | 136 | J. A. Wells. “Phylogeny and inter-relations of ecological traits and seed dispersal in rainforest plants: Exploring aspects of functional diversity in primary and secondary rainforests in Australia's Wet Tropics.”. PhD. University of Queensland, 2012. |
| Bloomfield_2018 | 24 | 124 | K. J. Bloomfield, L. A. Cernusak, D. Eamus, D. S. Ellsworth, I. C. Prentice, I. J. Wright, M. M. Boer, M. G. Bradford, P. Cale, J. Cleverly, J. J. G. Egerton, B. J. Evans, L. S. Hayes, M. F. Hutchinson, M. J. Liddell, C. Macfarlane, W. S. Meyer, S. M. Prober, H. F. Togashi, T. Wardlaw, L. Zhu, and O. K. Atkin. “A continental-scale assessment of variability in leaf traits: Within species, across sites and between seasons”. Functional Ecology 32.6 (2018), pp. 1492-1506. doi: 10.1111/1365-2435.13097. |
| Wills_2018 | 15 | 45 | J. Wills, J. Herbohn, J. Hu, S. Sohel, J. Baynes, and J. Firn. “Tree leaf trade-offs are stronger for sub-canopy trees: leaf traits reveal little about growth rates in canopy trees”. Ecological Applications 28.4 (2018), pp. 1116-1125. doi: 10.1002/eap.1715. |
| Zieminska_2015 | 12 | 36 | K. Ziemińska, M. Westoby, and I. J. Wright. “Broad anatomical variation within a narrow wood density range - A study of twig wood across 69 Australian Angiosperms”. PLOS ONE 10.4 (2015), p. e0124892. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124892. |
| ABRS_2023 | 16 | 23 | Australian Biological Resources Study. Flora of Australia, Australian Biological Resources Study, Canberra.. accessed on 14 September, 2022.. 2023. url: http://www.ausflora.org.au. |
| Cheesman_2020 | 12 | 23 | A. W. Cheesman, H. Duff, K. Hill, L. A. Cernusak, and F. A. McInerney. “Isotopic and morphologic proxies for reconstructing light environment and leaf function of fossil leaves: A modern calibration in the Daintree Rainforest, Australia”. American Journal of Botany 107 (2020), pp. 1165-1176. doi: 10.1002/ajb2.1523. |
| Kanowski_2000 | 23 | 23 | J. Kanowski. “Ecological determinants of the distribution and abundance of the folivorous marsupials endemic to the rainforests of the Atherton uplands, north Queensland.”. PhD. James Cook University, Townsville, 1999. |
| Kooyman_2011 | 8 | 10 | R. Kooyman, M. Rossetto, W. Cornwell, and M. Westoby. “Phylogenetic tests of community assembly across regional to continental scales in tropical and subtropical rain forests”. Global Ecology and Biogeography 20 (2011), pp. 707-716. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00641.x. |
| Cooper_2013 | 8 | 9 | W. Cooper and W. T. Cooper. Australian rainforest fruits. CSIRO Publishing, 2013, p. 272. |
| Rosell_2014 | 8 | 8 | J. A. Rosell, S. Gleason, R. Mendez-Alonzo, Y. Chang, and M. Westoby. “Bark functional ecology: Evidence for tradeoffs, functional coordination, and environment producing bark diversity”. New Phytologist 201.2 (2014), pp. 486-497. doi: 10.1111/nph.12541. |
| Sams_2017 | 7 | 8 | M. A. Sams, H. R. Lai, S. P. Bonser, P. A. Vesk, R. M. Kooyman, D. J. Metcalfe, J. W. Morgan, and M. M. Mayfield. “Landscape context explains changes in the functional diversity of regenerating forests better than climate or species richness”. Global Ecology and Biogeography 26.10 (2017), pp. 1165-1176. doi: 10.1111/geb.12627. |
| Tng_2013 | 6 | 6 | D. Y. P. Tng, G. J. Jordan, and D. M. J. S. Bowman. “Plant traits demonstrate that temperate and tropical giant Eucalypt forests are ecologically convergent with rainforest not savanna”. PLoS ONE 8 (2013), p. e84378. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084378. |
| Chen_2017 | 5 | 5 | Chen, S.-C., Cornwell, W., Z. H.-X., Moles, and A. T. “Plants show more flesh in the tropics: Variation in fruit type along latitudinal and climatic gradients.”. Ecography 40 (2017), pp. 531-538. doi: abs/10.1111/ecog.02010. |
| ABRS_2022 | 4 | 4 | Australian Biological Resources Study. Flora of Australia, Australian Biological Resources Study, Canberra.. accessed on 14 September, 2022.. 2022. url: http://www.ausflora.org.au. |
| Gross_2005 | 4 | 4 | C. L. Gross. “A comparison of the sexual systems in the trees from the Australian tropics with other tropical biomes-more monoecy but why?”. American Journal of Botany 92.6 (2005), pp. 907-919. doi: 10.3732/ajb.92.6.907. |
| Rumman_2018 | 4 | 4 | R. Rumman, O. K. Atkin, K. J. Bloomfield, and D. Eamus. “Variation in bulk-leaf 13C discrimination, leaf traits and wateruse efficiency-trait relationships along a continental-scale climate gradient in Australia”. Global Change Biology 24 (2018), pp. 1186-1200. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13911. |
| Sjostrom_2006 | 4 | 4 | A. Sjöström and C. L. Gross. “Life-history characters and phylogeny are correlated with extinction risk in the Australian angiosperms”. Journal of Biogeography 33.2 (2006), pp. 271-290. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2005.01393.x. |
| Grubb_2008 | 3 | 3 | P. J. Grubb, R. V. Jackson, I. M. Barberis, J. N. Bee, D. A. Coomes, N. J. Dominy, M. A. S. D. L. Fuente, P. W. Lucas, D. J. Metcalfe, J. Svenning, I. M. Turner, and O. Vargas. “Monocot leaves are eaten less than dicot leaves in tropical lowland rain forests: Correlations with toughness and leaf presentation”. Annals of Botany 101 (2008), pp. 1379-1389. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcn047. |
| Togashi_2015 | 1 | 3 | H. F. Togashi, I. C. Prentice, B. J. Evans, D. I. Forrester, P. Drake, P. Feikema, K. Brooksbank, D. Eamus, and D. Taylor. “Morphological and moisture availability controls of the leaf area-to-sapwood area ratio: analysis of measurements on Australian trees”. Ecology and Evolution 5.6 (2015), pp. 1263-1270. doi: 10.1002/ece3.1344. |
| ABRS_1981 | 2 | 2 | B. A. Barlow, H. T. Clifford, A. S. George, and A. K. A. McCusker. Flora of Australia. 1981. url: http://www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity/abrs/online-resources/flora/main/. |
| Ilic_2000 | 1 | 2 | J. Ilic, D. Boland, M. McDonald, D. G, and P. Blakemore. Woody density phase 1 - State of knowledge. National Carbon Accounting System. Technical Report 18. Tech. rep. Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia, 2000. |
| Wenk_2022 | 2 | 2 | E. Wenk. “Unpublished data: Australian plant growth forms dataset”. 2022. |
| Kew_2019_1 | 1 | 1 | Royal Botanic Gardens Kew. Seed Information Database (SID) and Seed Bank Database. 2019. url: http://data.kew.org/sid/. |
| Wenk_2023 | 1 | 1 | E. Wenk. “Unpublished data: Australian plant life history dataset, University of New South Wales, Sydney”. 2023. |
| Wright_2000 | 1 | 1 | I. J. Wright, H. T. Clifford, R. Kidson, M. L. Reed, B. L. Rice, and M. Westoby. “A survey of seed and seedling characters in 1744 Australian dicotyledon species: Cross-species trait correlations and correlated trait-shifts within evolutionary lineages”. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 69 (2000), pp. 521-547. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2000.tb01222.x. |