AusTraits

Endiandra microneura

Explore the data for this taxon in the portal

Family Lauraceae

Taxonomy: Endiandra microneura C.T.White

Synonyms: 1 (APC 2026-07-30)
  • Endiandra reticulata C.T.White (nomenclatural synonym)

Distribution (APC): Qld

Profiles: APC, Flora of Australia, ALA, iNaturalist, ATRP

Traits

Top source datasets: ABRS_1981 (3), ABRS_2022 (4), ABRS_2023 (15), Apgaua_2015 (48), Apgaua_2017 (12), Buckton_2019 (137), Cheesman_2020 (85), Chen_2017 (4), Cooper_2013 (14), Falster_2005_1 (9), Gross_2005 (4), Kooyman_2011 (8), Lusk_2012 (10), Rosell_2014 (8), Sjostrom_2006 (4), Wenk_2022 (2), Wenk_2023 (1), Wright_2000 (3), Zieminska_2015 (36). See below for a full list of sources.
Summary: AusTraits contains 76 traits from 407 records in 19 datasets.

Traits by category (click to expand). For categorical traits, the values are listed. For numerical traits, the mean and range are shown.

flower morphology
  • sex_type (categorical): dioecious (1); hermaphrodite (2) [sources: ABRS_2022; Gross_2005; Sjostrom_2006]
fruit morphology
  • fruit_length (numerical): 64 mm (50-78 mm) [sources: ABRS_2023; Cooper_2013]
  • fruit_width (numerical): 39 mm (28-57 mm) [sources: ABRS_2023; Cooper_2013]
  • fruit_type (categorical): drupe (4) [sources: Chen_2017; Cooper_2013; Gross_2005; Sjostrom_2006]
  • fruit_fleshiness (categorical): fleshy (4) [sources: Chen_2017; Cooper_2013; Gross_2005; Sjostrom_2006]
  • fruit_dehiscence (categorical): dehiscent (1); indehiscent (4) [sources: ABRS_2023; Chen_2017; Cooper_2013; Gross_2005; Sjostrom_2006]
  • fruit_colour (categorical): orange (1); yellow (1) [sources: ABRS_2023]
leaf morphology
  • leaf_area (numerical): 4669.34 mm2 (2481.83-20400 mm2) [sources: Apgaua_2015; Buckton_2019; Cheesman_2020; Falster_2005_1]
  • leaf_length (numerical): 103.76 mm (79.1-150 mm) [sources: Apgaua_2015; ABRS_2023]
  • leaf_width (numerical): 44.3 mm (30-65 mm) [sources: Apgaua_2015; ABRS_2023]
  • leaf_dry_mass (numerical): 511.41 mg (395.03-668.13 mg) [sources: Buckton_2019]
  • petiole_length (numerical): 1.25 cm (0.8-1.7 cm) [sources: ABRS_2023]
  • leaf_mass_per_area (numerical): 125.09 g/m2 (79.5-167.5 g/m2) [sources: Apgaua_2015; Buckton_2019; Cheesman_2020; Falster_2005_1; Lusk_2012; Zieminska_2015]
  • leaf_area_ratio (numerical): 4.3 mm2/mg (4.3-4.3 mm2/mg) [sources: Lusk_2012]
  • leaf_dry_matter_content (numerical): 0.41 g/g (0.38-0.45 g/g) [sources: Apgaua_2015; Buckton_2019]
  • leaf_shape (categorical): elliptical (1) [sources: ABRS_2023]
  • leaf_lobation (categorical): unlobed (1) [sources: Kooyman_2011]
  • leaf_compoundness (categorical): simple (2) [sources: ABRS_1981; Kooyman_2011]
  • plant_photosynthetic_organ (categorical): leaf (1) [sources: ABRS_2023]
life history
  • plant_growth_form (categorical): tree (7) [sources: ABRS_2022; Apgaua_2017; Buckton_2019; Cheesman_2020; Cooper_2013; Kooyman_2011; Wenk_2022]
  • life_history (categorical): perennial (2) [sources: ABRS_2022; Wenk_2023]
  • woodiness_detailed (categorical): woody (2) [sources: ABRS_2022; Wenk_2022]
  • leaf_phenology (categorical): evergreen (2) [sources: ABRS_1981; Kooyman_2011]
  • dispersers (categorical): cassowaries (1) [sources: Cooper_2013]
  • flowering_time (categorical): yyynnnnnnnny (1); yyyynnnnnnny (1) [sources: ABRS_1981; Cooper_2013]
nutrient and stable isotope
  • leaf_N_per_dry_mass (numerical): 17.36 mg/g (14.11-20.37 mg/g) [sources: Buckton_2019; Cheesman_2020; Falster_2005_1]
  • leaf_delta13C (numerical): -32.94 {delta}[ppth] (-37.02--30.21 {delta}[ppth]) [sources: Apgaua_2015; Apgaua_2017; Buckton_2019; Cheesman_2020]
seed morphology
  • seed_length (numerical): 53 mm (40-66 mm) [sources: Cooper_2013; Kooyman_2011]
  • seed_width (numerical): 33 mm (20-46 mm) [sources: Kooyman_2011]
stem morphology
  • wood_density (numerical): 0.62 mg/mm3 (0.46-0.72 mg/mm3) [sources: Apgaua_2015; Apgaua_2017; Buckton_2019; Falster_2005_1; Rosell_2014; Zieminska_2015]
  • huber_value (numerical): 0 mm2{sapwood}/mm2{leaf} (0-0 mm2{sapwood}/mm2{leaf}) [sources: Falster_2005_1; Zieminska_2015]
  • stem_vessel_density (numerical): 34.87 {count}/mm2 (5.71-116.87 {count}/mm2) [sources: Apgaua_2015; Apgaua_2017; Zieminska_2015]
  • stem_vessel_diameter (numerical): 86.61 um (15.9-160.43 um) [sources: Apgaua_2015; Apgaua_2017; Lusk_2012; Zieminska_2015]
  • stem_vessel_lumen_fraction (numerical): 0.11 mm2/mm2 (0.05-0.18 mm2/mm2) [sources: Apgaua_2015; Apgaua_2017; Zieminska_2015]
whole plant morphology
  • plant_height (numerical): 30 m (30-30 m) [sources: ABRS_2023; Cooper_2013]

Sources

dataset_idn_traitsn_recordsreference
Buckton_201926137G. Buckton, A. W. Cheesman, N. C. Munksgaard, C. M. Wurster, M. J. Liddell, and L. A. Cernusak. “Functional traits of lianas in an Australian lowland rainforest align with post-disturbance rather than dry season advantage”. Austral Ecology 44.6 (2019), pp. 983-994. doi: 10.1111/aec.12764.
Cheesman_20201285A. W. Cheesman, H. Duff, K. Hill, L. A. Cernusak, and F. A. McInerney. “Isotopic and morphologic proxies for reconstructing light environment and leaf function of fossil leaves: A modern calibration in the Daintree Rainforest, Australia”. American Journal of Botany 107 (2020), pp. 1165-1176. doi: 10.1002/ajb2.1523.
Apgaua_20151248D. M. G. Apgaua, F. Y. Ishida, D. Y. P. Tng, M. J. Laidlaw, R. M. Santos, R. Rumman, D. Eamus, J. A. M. Holtum, and S. G. W. Laurance. “Functional traits and water transport strategies in lowland tropical rainforest trees”. PLoS One 10.6 (2015), p. e0130799. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130799.
Zieminska_20151236K. Ziemińska, M. Westoby, and I. J. Wright. “Broad anatomical variation within a narrow wood density range - A study of twig wood across 69 Australian Angiosperms”. PLOS ONE 10.4 (2015), p. e0124892. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124892.
ABRS_20231015Australian Biological Resources Study. Flora of Australia, Australian Biological Resources Study, Canberra.. accessed on 14 September, 2022.. 2023. url: http://www.ausflora.org.au.
Cooper_20131114W. Cooper and W. T. Cooper. Australian rainforest fruits. CSIRO Publishing, 2013, p. 272.
Apgaua_20171112D. M. G. Apgaua, D. Y. P. Tng, L. A. Cernusak, A. W. Cheesman, R. M. Santos, W. J. Edwards, and S. G. W. Laurance. “Plant functional groups within a tropical forest exhibit different wood functional anatomy”. Functional Ecology 31.3 (2017), pp. 582-591. doi: 10.1111/1365-2435.12787.
Lusk_2012610C. H. Lusk, J. W. G. Kelly, and S. M. Gleason. “Light requirements of Australian tropical vs. cool-temperate rainforest tree species show different relationships with seedling growth and functional traits”. Annals of Botany 111 (2012), pp. 479-488. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcs289.
Falster_2005_169D. S. Falster and M. Westoby. “Alternative height strategies among 45 dicot rain forest species from tropical Queensland, Australia”. Journal of Ecology 93 (2005), pp. 521-535. doi: 10.1111/j.0022-0477.2005.00992.x.
Kooyman_201168R. Kooyman, M. Rossetto, W. Cornwell, and M. Westoby. “Phylogenetic tests of community assembly across regional to continental scales in tropical and subtropical rain forests”. Global Ecology and Biogeography 20 (2011), pp. 707-716. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00641.x.
Rosell_201488J. A. Rosell, S. Gleason, R. Mendez-Alonzo, Y. Chang, and M. Westoby. “Bark functional ecology: Evidence for tradeoffs, functional coordination, and environment producing bark diversity”. New Phytologist 201.2 (2014), pp. 486-497. doi: 10.1111/nph.12541.
ABRS_202244Australian Biological Resources Study. Flora of Australia, Australian Biological Resources Study, Canberra.. accessed on 14 September, 2022.. 2022. url: http://www.ausflora.org.au.
Chen_201744Chen, S.-C., Cornwell, W., Z. H.-X., Moles, and A. T. “Plants show more flesh in the tropics: Variation in fruit type along latitudinal and climatic gradients.”. Ecography 40 (2017), pp. 531-538. doi: abs/10.1111/ecog.02010.
Gross_200544C. L. Gross. “A comparison of the sexual systems in the trees from the Australian tropics with other tropical biomes-more monoecy but why?”. American Journal of Botany 92.6 (2005), pp. 907-919. doi: 10.3732/ajb.92.6.907.
Sjostrom_200644A. Sjöström and C. L. Gross. “Life-history characters and phylogeny are correlated with extinction risk in the Australian angiosperms”. Journal of Biogeography 33.2 (2006), pp. 271-290. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2005.01393.x.
ABRS_198133B. A. Barlow, H. T. Clifford, A. S. George, and A. K. A. McCusker. Flora of Australia. 1981. url: http://www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity/abrs/online-resources/flora/main/.
Wright_200033I. J. Wright, H. T. Clifford, R. Kidson, M. L. Reed, B. L. Rice, and M. Westoby. “A survey of seed and seedling characters in 1744 Australian dicotyledon species: Cross-species trait correlations and correlated trait-shifts within evolutionary lineages”. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 69 (2000), pp. 521-547. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2000.tb01222.x.
Wenk_202222E. Wenk. “Unpublished data: Australian plant growth forms dataset”. 2022.
Wenk_202311E. Wenk. “Unpublished data: Australian plant life history dataset, University of New South Wales, Sydney”. 2023.