AusTraits

Harpullia rhyticarpa

Explore the data for this taxon in the portal

Family Sapindaceae

Taxonomy: Harpullia rhyticarpa C.T.White & W.D.Francis

Synonyms: 1 (APC 2026-07-30)
  • Harpullia angustialata C.T.White & W.D.Francis (taxonomic synonym)

Distribution (APC): Qld

Profiles: APC, Flora of Australia, ALA, iNaturalist, ATRP

Traits

Top source datasets: ABRS_2022 (4), ABRS_2023 (17), ATRP_2020 (1), Apgaua_2017 (12), Chen_2017 (5), Cooper_2013 (13), Falster_2005_1 (8), Gross_2005 (4), Kooyman_2011 (10), Metcalfe_2009 (19), Sams_2017 (10), Sjostrom_2006 (4), Wells_2012 (129), Wenk_2022 (2), Wenk_2023 (1), Zieminska_2015 (36), eFLOWER_Dun_2022 (21). See below for a full list of sources.
Summary: AusTraits contains 93 traits from 296 records in 17 datasets.

Traits by category (click to expand). For categorical traits, the values are listed. For numerical traits, the mean and range are shown.

fire response
flower morphology
  • flower_colour (categorical): white_cream (1) [sources: eFLOWER_Dun_2022]
  • sex_type (categorical): dioecious (3) [sources: ABRS_2022; Gross_2005; Sjostrom_2006]
fruit morphology
  • fruit_length (numerical): 22 mm (15-33 mm) [sources: ABRS_2023; Cooper_2013]
  • fruit_width (numerical): 33.5 mm (25-42 mm) [sources: Cooper_2013]
  • fruit_type (categorical): capsule (5) [sources: Chen_2017; Cooper_2013; Gross_2005; Sams_2017; Sjostrom_2006]
  • fruit_fleshiness (categorical): dry (7) [sources: Chen_2017; Cooper_2013; Gross_2005; Metcalfe_2009; Sams_2017; Sjostrom_2006; Wells_2012]
  • fruit_dehiscence (categorical): dehiscent (8) [sources: ABRS_2023; Chen_2017; Cooper_2013; Gross_2005; Metcalfe_2009; Sams_2017; Sjostrom_2006; Wells_2012]
  • fruit_colour (categorical): orange (1); yellow (1) [sources: ABRS_2023]
leaf morphology
  • leaf_area (numerical): 28268 mm2 (15660-40876 mm2) [sources: Falster_2005_1; Metcalfe_2009]
  • leaflet_area (numerical): 3505.97 mm2 (1296.29-9764.83 mm2) [sources: Wells_2012]
  • leaf_length (numerical): 196.25 mm (35-290 mm) [sources: ABRS_2023; Kooyman_2011]
  • leaf_width (numerical): 62.5 mm (15-90 mm) [sources: ABRS_2023; Kooyman_2011]
  • petiole_length (numerical): 7.25 cm (4.5-10 cm) [sources: ABRS_2023]
  • leaf_mass_per_area (numerical): 65.11 g/m2 (42.08-108.39 g/m2) [sources: Falster_2005_1; Sams_2017; Wells_2012; Zieminska_2015]
  • leaf_dry_matter_content (numerical): 0.31 g/g (0.26-0.4 g/g) [sources: Wells_2012]
  • leaf_shape (categorical): elliptical (1); oblong (1); ovate (1) [sources: ABRS_2023]
  • leaf_margin (categorical): entire (2) [sources: ABRS_2023]
  • leaf_lobation (categorical): unlobed (1) [sources: Kooyman_2011]
  • leaf_compoundness (categorical): compound (2) [sources: ABRS_2023; Kooyman_2011]
  • plant_photosynthetic_organ (categorical): leaf (1) [sources: ABRS_2023]
life history
nutrient and stable isotope
  • leaf_N_per_dry_mass (numerical): 17.4 mg/g (17.4-17.4 mg/g) [sources: Falster_2005_1]
  • leaf_delta13C (numerical): -35.73 {delta}[ppth] (-35.73--35.73 {delta}[ppth]) [sources: Apgaua_2017]
seed morphology
  • seed_dry_mass (numerical): 320 mg (320-320 mg) [sources: Metcalfe_2009]
  • seed_length (numerical): 13 mm (12-14 mm) [sources: Cooper_2013; Kooyman_2011]
  • seed_width (numerical): 8 mm (7-9 mm) [sources: Kooyman_2011]
stem morphology
  • wood_density (numerical): 0.6 mg/mm3 (0.45-0.76 mg/mm3) [sources: Apgaua_2017; Falster_2005_1; Metcalfe_2009; Sams_2017; Wells_2012; Zieminska_2015]
  • huber_value (numerical): 0 mm2{sapwood}/mm2{leaf} (0-0 mm2{sapwood}/mm2{leaf}) [sources: Falster_2005_1; Zieminska_2015]
  • stem_vessel_density (numerical): 90.55 {count}/mm2 (79.5-112.54 {count}/mm2) [sources: Apgaua_2017; Zieminska_2015]
  • stem_vessel_diameter (numerical): 31.11 um (27.86-37.21 um) [sources: Apgaua_2017; Zieminska_2015]
  • stem_vessel_lumen_fraction (numerical): 0.07 mm2/mm2 (0.04-0.12 mm2/mm2) [sources: Apgaua_2017; Zieminska_2015]
whole plant morphology

Sources

dataset_idn_traitsn_recordsreference
Wells_201223129J. A. Wells. “Phylogeny and inter-relations of ecological traits and seed dispersal in rainforest plants: Exploring aspects of functional diversity in primary and secondary rainforests in Australia's Wet Tropics.”. PhD. University of Queensland, 2012.
Zieminska_20151236K. Ziemińska, M. Westoby, and I. J. Wright. “Broad anatomical variation within a narrow wood density range - A study of twig wood across 69 Australian Angiosperms”. PLOS ONE 10.4 (2015), p. e0124892. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124892.
eFLOWER_Dun_20221821L. Dun and H. Sauquet. “Unpublished: Floral traits for GAP taxa, University of New South Wales, Australia”. 2022.
Metcalfe_20091919E. Laliberte, J. A. Wells, F. DeClerck, D. J. Metcalfe, C. P. Catterall, C. Queiroz, I. Aubin, S. P. Bonser, Y. Ding, J. M. Fraterrigo, S. McNamara, J. W. Morgan, D. S. Merlos, P. A. Vesk, and M. M. Mayfield. “Land-use intensification reduces functional redundancy and response diversity in plant communities”. Ecology Letters 13.1 (2010), pp. 76-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01403.x.
ABRS_20231217Australian Biological Resources Study. Flora of Australia, Australian Biological Resources Study, Canberra.. accessed on 14 September, 2022.. 2023. url: http://www.ausflora.org.au.
Cooper_20131013W. Cooper and W. T. Cooper. Australian rainforest fruits. CSIRO Publishing, 2013, p. 272.
Apgaua_20171112D. M. G. Apgaua, D. Y. P. Tng, L. A. Cernusak, A. W. Cheesman, R. M. Santos, W. J. Edwards, and S. G. W. Laurance. “Plant functional groups within a tropical forest exhibit different wood functional anatomy”. Functional Ecology 31.3 (2017), pp. 582-591. doi: 10.1111/1365-2435.12787.
Kooyman_2011810R. Kooyman, M. Rossetto, W. Cornwell, and M. Westoby. “Phylogenetic tests of community assembly across regional to continental scales in tropical and subtropical rain forests”. Global Ecology and Biogeography 20 (2011), pp. 707-716. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00641.x.
Sams_2017910M. A. Sams, H. R. Lai, S. P. Bonser, P. A. Vesk, R. M. Kooyman, D. J. Metcalfe, J. W. Morgan, and M. M. Mayfield. “Landscape context explains changes in the functional diversity of regenerating forests better than climate or species richness”. Global Ecology and Biogeography 26.10 (2017), pp. 1165-1176. doi: 10.1111/geb.12627.
Falster_2005_168D. S. Falster and M. Westoby. “Alternative height strategies among 45 dicot rain forest species from tropical Queensland, Australia”. Journal of Ecology 93 (2005), pp. 521-535. doi: 10.1111/j.0022-0477.2005.00992.x.
Chen_201755Chen, S.-C., Cornwell, W., Z. H.-X., Moles, and A. T. “Plants show more flesh in the tropics: Variation in fruit type along latitudinal and climatic gradients.”. Ecography 40 (2017), pp. 531-538. doi: abs/10.1111/ecog.02010.
ABRS_202244Australian Biological Resources Study. Flora of Australia, Australian Biological Resources Study, Canberra.. accessed on 14 September, 2022.. 2022. url: http://www.ausflora.org.au.
Gross_200544C. L. Gross. “A comparison of the sexual systems in the trees from the Australian tropics with other tropical biomes-more monoecy but why?”. American Journal of Botany 92.6 (2005), pp. 907-919. doi: 10.3732/ajb.92.6.907.
Sjostrom_200644A. Sjöström and C. L. Gross. “Life-history characters and phylogeny are correlated with extinction risk in the Australian angiosperms”. Journal of Biogeography 33.2 (2006), pp. 271-290. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2005.01393.x.
Wenk_202222E. Wenk. “Unpublished data: Australian plant growth forms dataset”. 2022.
ATRP_202011F. A. Zich, B. P. Hyland, T. Whiffin, and R. A. Kerrigan. Australian Tropical Rainforest Plants, Edition 8. 2020. url: https://apps.lucidcentral.org/rainforest/text/intro/index.html.
Wenk_202311E. Wenk. “Unpublished data: Australian plant life history dataset, University of New South Wales, Sydney”. 2023.