Hedycarya loxocarya
Explore the data for this taxon in the portal
Family Monimiaceae
Taxonomy: Hedycarya loxocarya (Benth.) W.D.Francis
Synonyms: 2 (APC 2026-07-30)
- Mollinedia loxocarya Benth. (nomenclatural synonym)
- Wilkiea loxocarya (Benth.) Perkins (nomenclatural synonym)
Distribution (APC): Qld
Profiles: APC, Flora of Australia, ALA, iNaturalist, ATRP
Traits
Top source datasets: ABRS_1981 (1), ABRS_2022 (4), ABRS_2023 (18), Chen_2017 (5), Cooper_2013 (14), Gross_2005 (4), Ilic_2000 (1), Kew_2019_1 (1), Kooyman_2011 (12), Sams_2017 (9), Sjostrom_2006 (4), Tng_2013 (5), Wells_2012 (128), Wenk_2022 (2), Wenk_2023 (1), Wright_2000 (1). See below for a full list of sources.
Summary: AusTraits contains 48 traits from 210 records in 16 datasets.
Traits by category (click to expand). For categorical traits, the values are listed. For numerical traits, the mean and range are shown.
flower morphology
- sex_type (categorical): dioecious (3) [sources: ABRS_2022; Gross_2005; Sjostrom_2006]
fruit morphology
- fruit_length (numerical): 9.25 mm (7-10 mm) [sources: ABRS_2023; Cooper_2013]
- fruit_width (numerical): 6.75 mm (6-9 mm) [sources: ABRS_2023; Cooper_2013]
- fruit_type (categorical): drupe (6) [sources: ABRS_2023; Chen_2017; Cooper_2013; Gross_2005; Sams_2017; Sjostrom_2006]
- fruit_fleshiness (categorical): fleshy (6) [sources: Chen_2017; Cooper_2013; Gross_2005; Sams_2017; Sjostrom_2006; Wells_2012]
- fruit_dehiscence (categorical): indehiscent (5) [sources: Chen_2017; Cooper_2013; Gross_2005; Sams_2017; Sjostrom_2006]
- fruit_colour (categorical): red (1) [sources: ABRS_2023]
leaf morphology
- leaf_area (numerical): 4967.94 mm2 (1993.08-7466 mm2) [sources: Tng_2013; Wells_2012]
- leaf_length (numerical): 110 mm (50-190 mm) [sources: ABRS_2023; Kooyman_2011]
- leaf_width (numerical): 57 mm (23-70 mm) [sources: ABRS_2023; Kooyman_2011]
- leaf_dry_mass (numerical): 235.37 mg (60.01-441.31 mg) [sources: Wells_2012]
- petiole_length (numerical): 1.6 cm (1.2-2 cm) [sources: ABRS_2023]
- leaf_mass_per_area (numerical): 56.17 g/m2 (29.02-68.75 g/m2) [sources: Sams_2017; Tng_2013; Wells_2012]
- leaf_dry_matter_content (numerical): 0.21 g/g (0.17-0.25 g/g) [sources: Wells_2012]
- leaf_shape (categorical): elliptical (1); obovate (1) [sources: ABRS_2023]
- leaf_base_shape (categorical): attenuate (1) [sources: ABRS_2023]
- leaf_margin (categorical): entire (1) [sources: ABRS_2023]
- leaf_lobation (categorical): unlobed (1) [sources: Kooyman_2011]
- leaf_compoundness (categorical): simple (2) [sources: ABRS_2023; Kooyman_2011]
- leaf_phyllotaxis (categorical): opposite (1) [sources: ABRS_2023]
- plant_photosynthetic_organ (categorical): leaf (1) [sources: ABRS_2023]
life history
- plant_growth_form (categorical): tree (5) [sources: ABRS_2022; Cooper_2013; Kooyman_2011; Wells_2012; Wenk_2022]
- life_history (categorical): perennial (2) [sources: ABRS_2022; Wenk_2023]
- woodiness_detailed (categorical): woody (2) [sources: ABRS_2022; Wenk_2022]
- leaf_phenology (categorical): evergreen (1) [sources: Kooyman_2011]
- pollination_syndrome (categorical): beetle (1) [sources: Wells_2012]
- dispersers (categorical): birds (2); flying_vertebrates (1) [sources: Cooper_2013; Sams_2017; Wells_2012]
- flowering_time (categorical): nnnnyyyyynnn (3) [sources: ABRS_1981; Chen_2017; Cooper_2013]
nutrient and stable isotope
- leaf_delta13C (numerical): -34.76 {delta}[ppth] (-34.76--34.76 {delta}[ppth]) [sources: Tng_2013]
seed morphology
- seed_dry_mass (numerical): 35 mg (35-35 mg) [sources: Kew_2019_1]
- seed_length (numerical): 6 mm (5-7 mm) [sources: Cooper_2013; Kooyman_2011]
- seed_width (numerical): 4.5 mm (4-5 mm) [sources: Kooyman_2011]
stem morphology
- wood_density (numerical): 0.5 mg/mm3 (0.32-0.59 mg/mm3) [sources: Ilic_2000; Kooyman_2011; Sams_2017; Tng_2013; Wells_2012]
whole plant morphology
- plant_height (numerical): 20.25 m (6-25 m) [sources: ABRS_2023; Cooper_2013]
Sources
| dataset_id | n_traits | n_records | reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wells_2012 | 22 | 128 | J. A. Wells. “Phylogeny and inter-relations of ecological traits and seed dispersal in rainforest plants: Exploring aspects of functional diversity in primary and secondary rainforests in Australia's Wet Tropics.”. PhD. University of Queensland, 2012. |
| ABRS_2023 | 14 | 18 | Australian Biological Resources Study. Flora of Australia, Australian Biological Resources Study, Canberra.. accessed on 14 September, 2022.. 2023. url: http://www.ausflora.org.au. |
| Cooper_2013 | 11 | 14 | W. Cooper and W. T. Cooper. Australian rainforest fruits. CSIRO Publishing, 2013, p. 272. |
| Kooyman_2011 | 9 | 12 | R. Kooyman, M. Rossetto, W. Cornwell, and M. Westoby. “Phylogenetic tests of community assembly across regional to continental scales in tropical and subtropical rain forests”. Global Ecology and Biogeography 20 (2011), pp. 707-716. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00641.x. |
| Sams_2017 | 8 | 9 | M. A. Sams, H. R. Lai, S. P. Bonser, P. A. Vesk, R. M. Kooyman, D. J. Metcalfe, J. W. Morgan, and M. M. Mayfield. “Landscape context explains changes in the functional diversity of regenerating forests better than climate or species richness”. Global Ecology and Biogeography 26.10 (2017), pp. 1165-1176. doi: 10.1111/geb.12627. |
| Chen_2017 | 5 | 5 | Chen, S.-C., Cornwell, W., Z. H.-X., Moles, and A. T. “Plants show more flesh in the tropics: Variation in fruit type along latitudinal and climatic gradients.”. Ecography 40 (2017), pp. 531-538. doi: abs/10.1111/ecog.02010. |
| Tng_2013 | 5 | 5 | D. Y. P. Tng, G. J. Jordan, and D. M. J. S. Bowman. “Plant traits demonstrate that temperate and tropical giant Eucalypt forests are ecologically convergent with rainforest not savanna”. PLoS ONE 8 (2013), p. e84378. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084378. |
| ABRS_2022 | 4 | 4 | Australian Biological Resources Study. Flora of Australia, Australian Biological Resources Study, Canberra.. accessed on 14 September, 2022.. 2022. url: http://www.ausflora.org.au. |
| Gross_2005 | 4 | 4 | C. L. Gross. “A comparison of the sexual systems in the trees from the Australian tropics with other tropical biomes-more monoecy but why?”. American Journal of Botany 92.6 (2005), pp. 907-919. doi: 10.3732/ajb.92.6.907. |
| Sjostrom_2006 | 4 | 4 | A. Sjöström and C. L. Gross. “Life-history characters and phylogeny are correlated with extinction risk in the Australian angiosperms”. Journal of Biogeography 33.2 (2006), pp. 271-290. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2005.01393.x. |
| Wenk_2022 | 2 | 2 | E. Wenk. “Unpublished data: Australian plant growth forms dataset”. 2022. |
| ABRS_1981 | 1 | 1 | B. A. Barlow, H. T. Clifford, A. S. George, and A. K. A. McCusker. Flora of Australia. 1981. url: http://www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity/abrs/online-resources/flora/main/. |
| Ilic_2000 | 1 | 1 | J. Ilic, D. Boland, M. McDonald, D. G, and P. Blakemore. Woody density phase 1 - State of knowledge. National Carbon Accounting System. Technical Report 18. Tech. rep. Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, Australia, 2000. |
| Kew_2019_1 | 1 | 1 | Royal Botanic Gardens Kew. Seed Information Database (SID) and Seed Bank Database. 2019. url: http://data.kew.org/sid/. |
| Wenk_2023 | 1 | 1 | E. Wenk. “Unpublished data: Australian plant life history dataset, University of New South Wales, Sydney”. 2023. |
| Wright_2000 | 1 | 1 | I. J. Wright, H. T. Clifford, R. Kidson, M. L. Reed, B. L. Rice, and M. Westoby. “A survey of seed and seedling characters in 1744 Australian dicotyledon species: Cross-species trait correlations and correlated trait-shifts within evolutionary lineages”. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 69 (2000), pp. 521-547. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2000.tb01222.x. |